• Survey of city actions to support walking, cycling during COVID (PedBikeInfo)
• Coronavirus reveals transit’s true mission (CityLab)
• Free rail travel to those fleeing domestic abuse during lockdown (RailDeliveryGroup)
• We need to give up our addiction to flying (Guardian)
• Network Rail’s new focus on architecture & design – Part 2 (BeautyOfTransport)
• Cardboard City: New York’s logistics disruption (UrbanOmnibus)
• Federal Judge says Lyft, Uber violating law (Bloomberg)
Read our most popular articles:
- Schrodinger’s Cab Firm: Uber’s Existential Crisis
- You Hacked – Cyber-security and the railways
- On Our Line Podcast #8: Talking Uber, Lyft and Mobility disruption
And some of our other sections:
Feel we should read something or include in a future list? Email us at [email protected].
Reconnections is funded largely by its community. Like what we do? Buy us a cup of coffee or visit our shop.
I can’t imagine the toilets at London Bridge would pass the new Network Rail guidelines, far too small and poorly laid out so that there are lots of conflicting passenger movements
Of course, “British Railways” had their own Design Panel ( The late Brian Haresnape was involved ) & it did some very good work.
Like other things at the time, it was deliberateky smashed at privatisation as “un-needed” or “unwanted” or something like that..
Now, it looks as though it was needed, after all?
The article-writers seem unaware of this recent history, though.