Rail travel for work: which companies have sustainable business travel? (Transport&Environment)

Flying for work is all too common for some employees. But on some common routes like London-Amsterdam, traveling by rail over plane will reduce the employee’s carbon footprint by 93%.  Yet, too few companies have embraced rail in their business travel policies, a new briefing by the Travel Smart Campaign finds.

Business travel represents 15-20% of global air travel[1]. At a time when companies are trying to reduce  their carbon footprints, cutting down on  business flying is an easy way to meet sustainability goals. Rail travel is a viable and desirable option, available to companies operating in Europe and the US. Yet too few companies are embracing rail travel in their business travel policies. This is the main finding of a new briefing by the Travel Smart Campaign and Transport & Environment. On certain routes, emissions reduction can go up to -97%.


Only very few companies are actively promoting rail travel among employees. The Travel Smart campaign surveyed 322 companies[2] to gather information on their travel policy practices. Of the companies which replied to the survey, 28 have established policies to shift business flying to rail. Notably, 294 companies either lack policies or have not been identified as having specific policies to shift from air to rail. This is a worrying observation, given the urgency of the climate crisis, T&E says.

Among the respondents, the Travel Smart campaign identified seven companies with ambitious rail policies. These are Swiss Re, Steelcase, ABN Amro, Mapfre, Publicis Group, Ante Group and Simon Kucher.  Among the policies identified were:

  • Companies set a travel climate budget for the company and per department;
  • Companies set a target to convert a share of the air journeys to rail;
  • Employees must use the train instead of plan for trips below a certain amount of hours or kilometers;
  • Employees are offered a bigger budget and offer the possibility of booking first class tickets when feasible, to encourage traveling by rail;
  • Employees are allowed to telework in the train during personal travel.

Companies were also asked to submit data on kilometers traveled by air and rail in 2019 versus 2022. 14 companies submitted data, and in all cases, the companies had reduced the kilometers traveled by air. 6 of the 14 had increased rail travel as a consequence.

The Travel Smart campaign encourages businesses to follow the lead of the seven companies mentioned above and to set ambitious rail travel policies that will enable them to significantly reduce corporate travel emissions.

Read on

One comment

  1. One of the persistent issues around international trail travel across Europe (and long distance domestic rail travel) is the consumer protection in case of disruption for rail travel is far less than for air travel.

    This doesn’t matter for big companies who use professional travel agencies with helplines that can make rebookings if the disruption is major, but small businesses rely on dself-booking and do not have that level of backup.

    Needs EU/EEA/UK legislation to even this out to help unblock modal shift in travel from Air to Rail.

Comments are closed.