North By North West Ruislip

Dan Coombs, writing in the “Uxbridge Gazette” reports the aspirations of Hillingdon Council to extend the Central Line from West Ruislip to join the Metropolitan Line to Uxbridge between Ruislip and Ickenham.

HILLINGDON Council is to lobby TfL to have the Central underground line extended from West Ruislip to Uxbridge.

The reasoning behind the plans is that having the line will cut traffic on the A40 and the Uxbridge Road, both serving ‘a key transport corridor’ to Ealing.

Uxbridge is currently served by two underground lines, the Metropolitan and Piccadilly lines, and it would be logistically simple to extend the Central line track to link from its terminal in West Ruislip into Ickenham station.

For the plan to become possible, Hillingdon Council must convince TfL there is a business case, and fear it could take 10 years to come to fruition.

Councillor Douglas Mills, cabinet member for improvements, partnerships and community safety (Con), said: “We are realistic, it is not going to be done overnight, but we have already held a couple of meetings with TfL about it. We feel that compared to other metropolitan town centres in London, such as Kingston, Uxbridge could be better served by the tube. TfL feel at the moment the business case is weak, and it is up to us to build it up.

“As the landscape of Uxbridge changes, as homes on RAF Uxbridge are built, this will change, and the need will grow. There is a strong argument that it will reduce traffic on the Uxbridge Road and the A40. This is if you look at where the Central line serves, places in Ealing, and reducing traffic is a long term objective of ours.”

The Central Line serves West Ruislip, Ruislip Gardens, South Ruislip, Northolt, Greenford, Perivale, Hanger Lane, Ealing Broadway, North Acton, and West Acton, White City, and Shepherds Bush, before extending into central and east London.

“In terms of land, there is no HS2 like problem of it going through back gardens or houses, but it is a bit more complicated than simply putting in a set of new points at West Ruislip.”

TfL has told the council the whole project will only become viable, once upgrades to the signalling system on the Metropolitan Line is complete, which the Gazette has previously revealed could take up to 2017.

Councillor Mills added: “The current Central Line trains will not work on the existing track and with the signalling system the Met line uses, so that will have to be finished first. But we feel within 10 years we can make it happen. First a more pressing issue is the re-introduction of a north to south borough bus route, which TfL pulled the plug on last year.”

The project was stopped mid-consultation last year because of financial pressures, but the council feel now is the right time to reignite the project, for a service the east-west centred transport in Hillingdon vitally needs.

MP John Randall, Uxbridge and South Ruislip representative (Con), said: “This has been raised before, and I support the idea, I think it would be of fantastic benefit to Uxbridge, and could bring more employment to the town.”

At first sight this seems quite straightforward but, as Hillingdon Council and TfL get into these ideas, complexities seem sure to arise.

Ruislip Depot lies to the south west of the Central Line’s West Ruislip branch and the Great Western and Great Central 1903 Joint Line from Old Oak Common and Neasden to High Wycombe. It is bordered to the North West by the Metropolitan line’s Harrow on the Hill to Uxbridge branch. The depot was built as part of the western extension of the Central line from North Acton. In 1936, as part of the New Works Programme, Parliamentary authority had been granted for the two additional tracks from North Acton to West Ruislip. In 1937, further powers were obtained to extend from West Ruislip to Denham although, like the Northern line extension beyond Edgware, these were subsequently allowed to lapse.

Construction began and the depot was virtually complete by July 1940. At that date the Ministry of Transport decided to suspend the both the eastern and western extensions of the Central pending the end of hostilities. The facility did not, however, stand idle as it was taken over by the Birmingham Small Arms Company – BSA (later famed for their motor bikes) for the manufacture of anti-aircraft guns. It was returned to London Transport in 1945 and in 1948 the line to West Ruislip was opened.

The Metropolitan line from Harrow on the Hill to Uxbridge had opened on the 4th July 1904. The section of line from South Harrow to Rayners Lane had been used as a test track for the Metropolitan’s first electric trains. Services to and from Baker Street were introduced. The Metropolitan Railway Country Estates Ltd, the creators of “Metroland” vigorously promoted new development alongside the branch, Early traffic and property development results were, however, disappointing such that in 1908 through trains to Baker Street were removed leaving the line served by a shuttle service. In 1903 a connection at Rayners Lane was made by the Metropolitan’s rival and inner city collaborator, the Metropolitan District Railway, as part of its extension from North Ealing but (no doubt discouraged by the limited traffic prospects) no District trains ran beyond South Harrow until 1910. Piccadilly Line trains subsequently took over from the District running through to Uxbridge from Rayners Lane on the 23rd October 1933.

As the Ordnance Survey Map shows, there is already an existing connection between the Central Line and the Metropolitan line’s Uxbridge Branch. The City end entry to West Ruislip depot diverges just to the north of Ruislip Gardens Station and the link route runs along the south westerly side of the depot. Somewhat surprisingly this link was not put until 1973 and is only used by permanent way vehicles.


As can been seen from the picture below, taken by a police helicopter, of the London end of Ruislip Depot, the connecting single track link from the Central Line depot runs to the rear of the roads 64 – 70 occupied by the high visibility livered battery electric permanent way locomotives.

Our thanks and copyright acknowledgements to Dennis Troughton and the mine of visual information that is Geograph.

It may well be possible to adapt the alignment to allow Central Line trains to take a short cut through the depot. This would not be the first instance of passengers riding through a depot, as northbound Bakerloo passengers nip through the north shed at Queens Park on their way to join the L&NWR New Line at the far end of the shed. Sidings exist alongside the Ruislip chord for most of the route through the depot allowing a double track connection to be built, but at the Metropolitan end only a reversing siding leading to a facing crossover towards Ruislip’s Metropolitan station is in place

Difficulties that might be encountered include questions of capacity at Charles Holden’s three platform station at Uxbridge particularly at peak times. There is also the issue of compatibility between rolling stock signalling and control systems or the Metropolitan, Piccadilly and Central lines. This in turn hinges on the state of technological maturity of various elements on each line – rolling stock renewal and signalling renewal are intimately connected and hence have to be aligned. Even the same type of rolling stock may not be compatible – for example, it is not possible to run the Waterloo and City stock which is not fitted with Automatic Train Operation ATO on the Central Line which is.

Eventually it will all come down to the business case, during which the scheme and alternatives could be considered. If it is decided that improving access to Uxbridge and A40 corridor residents to the Central Line is the overall name of the game then perhaps it might be time to dust off an earlier scheme for a new joint Piccadilly/Central line station at Park Royal – but that is another story…

50 comments

  1. The 1st priority is to extend the Piccadilly line from Uxbridge, via the old Cowley/West Drayton pathway to West Drayton and then on to a new station at Harlington Cross and then into Heathrow (ideally T5, but otherwise T1/2/3). This would then form the West London Loop for the Piccadilly Line; an idea which was first mooted in the 1960’s when the discussions were taking place to extend the Piccadilly Line from Hounslow to Heathrow. This would allow TfL to re-develop Uxbridge station by putting it underground — with 3, or 4, bay platforms in a central position and 2 through lines for the Piccadilly Line to go round the outside of these bay platforms. The existing terminus station could then be converted into a bus station, with direct links via lifts and escalators to the station below. The current bus station is completely inadequate and badly set out, with many services terminating in a side road, or unable to access the bus station at all. When this is completed the Central Line could be diverted via West Ruislip sheds to a joint inter-change station at Ickenham.

    The need for a West London Loop on the Piccadilly Line is clear. The Airport, and associated industries, are the biggest source of employment in the Borough of Hillingdon, yet there are no direct public transport links from North to South in the Borough. The Evening Standard reported, early last year (?), that the road running north-south from Uxbridge to West Drayton was one of the 10 busiest roads in London. The journey from the Northern regions of the Borough to Heathrow (South of the Borough) is tortuous.

    Since the Uxbridge (Vine Street) to West Drayton Line was closed in the early 1960’s much new development has occurred in the area. Brunel University lies beside the pathway of the old railway line and accommodates about 30000 students and staff (currently only served by very slow bus routes), Hillingdon Hospital (the main hospital for the Borough, and one of 2 emergency hospitals for series incidents at Heathrow), and the building of the Stockley Park Business Park. Currently a major new development is also taking place of the former RAF station in Uxbridge, providing housing, theatre, shops, offices, museum facilities). These are the reasons why the need for the West London Loop Line on the Piccadilly is essential, and should be seriously considered now whilst TfL is considering the orders for signalling and stock on the new Piccadilly Line trains, for service in the next decade.

    In the meantime TfL should investigate the possibility, again, of running express bus services from the North of Hillingdon Borough to Heathrow. The main route, previously suggested, was to run from Northwood Hills Station, (?possible stop at Eastcote High Road or Bridle Road?), Eastcote Station, Eastcote Lane, South Ruislip Station (which will require the route to be serviced by single deck vehicles), Ruislip Gardens Station/Northolt Airport, West Ruislip Station, Ickenham Pump, Hillingdon Station, Uxbridge (new development of former RAF station), Brunel University, Hillingdon Hospital, West Drayton Station, Harlington Cross, Heathrow Central

  2. @Tev: there are no direct public transport links from North to South in the Borough

    What are those big red things which regularly run from West Drayton, Hillingdon, etc to Heathrow? Not to mention the express buses that already run from Uxbridge to Heathrow.

    Hillingdon Hospital (the main hospital for the Borough, and one of 2 emergency hospitals for series incidents at Heathrow)

    Something tells me in the event of a serious incident at Heathrow, the casualties won’t be travelling to the hospital by public transport…

  3. Emergency casualties may not go by public transport but staff and patients do…

  4. @Trev – as someone who used to live a short walk from Eastcote, Bridle Road, and stillhas many friends in the area, I can assure you that very few of the locals are airport workers – the housing is more than a trifle expensive for the sort of employees who generate the high volumes of traffic to the airport. (And as for Ickenham and Northwood …) The big numbers come from Southall (route 105 bus does this trip), Uxbridge and areas to the south (route U10), and South Harrow (witness the recent allnight service on the 140). Route 724 provides an express service to the northern parts of Hillingdon. TfL London Buses publish a useful “spider map” of the Heathrow bus connexions.

  5. @GTR driver
    “Emergency casualties may not go by public transport but staff and patients do”

    But I doubt many hospital staff or outpatients fly in to Heathrow Airport as part of their journeys to the hospital. A hospital needs multiple local links, not one trunk link to a single destination.

  6. @Timbeau: Indeed. I was poking fun at a rhetorical technique that seems common in discussion of transport: it consists of asserting that Place A is an Important Place, and the Place B is an Important Place, and that therefore there is a pressing need for transport (rail transport, because what other kind is there?) from Place A to Place B.

  7. @Ian J,

    Worse still. A is an important place. B is an important place. C is an relatively unimportant place on the current route from A to B. Everyone in C clamours for improvements and argues that that they are necessary because it is so busy and it is so popular. So the possibly more sensible option of taking the shorter route via D is opposed by those at C.

    And in a bit of mischief making could I suggest that A is New Cross Gate, B is Elephant & Castle and C, of course, is Camberwell.

  8. @PoP
    except of course that in your example C is not on the current route from A to B. (It would be if A was Catford)

  9. @timbeau: And of course a serious accident happens on a daily basis…

    Of course if one were to happen and one did require the services of a large number of buses to run between the airport and the hospital, perhaps some rail replacement buses could serve as a temporary Western loop for the piccadilly line?

  10. @Anon 23 June 2011
    An update:
    US engineering firm Bechtel are moving their offices from Hammersmith to Park Royal. Bellway are now building out the residential development at First Central.

Comments are closed.